one-to-many messaging

[James Firth]

On 01 April 2008 14:42, Richard Clayton wrote:
> >I thought that "what was on the site" was supposed to be the IWF's only
> >criterion for blocking, i.e. only if the site contains indecent images
> >of children (aka "child abuse images" in the approved Newspeak phrase).
> >I suppose I am old-fashioned.
> 
> yes indeed... but Google implements other processes and criteria for
> what they are prepared to return in search results

Of course Phorm have over the last 6 weeks consistently compared their data
gathering to Google.

But the Phorm implementation is about as closely related to Google as the
National Coal Board.  Similarly with Cleanfeed and Google.

You can choose your search engine, change it several times a day if you
wish.  You can choose the websites you visit.  Your ISP is somewhat
different, with many people locked in contractually, geographically and with
co-bundled services.