Minister promises that Part III is coming

[Roland Perry]

In article 
<S815126AbWELWBX/20060512220125Z+336227@anchor-fallback-95.mail.demon.net
 >, Ian Johnson <Ian.Johnson@uwe.ac.uk> writes
>If the *only* evidence of any crime being committed is on the perps
>computer, I would question the need to prosecute at all.

By that, do you mean to imply it's a victimless crime? If the only 
effect of the crime has been to create some files on an isolated 
computer?

How does that work when the crime is a fraud, and the evidence that 
would point to the perpetrator can only be found on his PC - because the 
external incriminating evidence has been erased (deliberately or 
otherwise).
-- 
Roland Perry