Minister promises that Part III is coming
Caspar Bowden
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 12 May 2006 21:28:01 +0100
>admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk] On Behalf Of Brian Morrison
>>"Caspar Bowden" <casparb@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>What is safe to agree, I think, is that convicted child molesters
>>should be on notice to prove the innocence of their data.=20
..
>>...in my view this is a
>>reasonable forfeit of liberty in the circumstances
>Is there such a thing as "a reasonable forfeit of liberty"? It may seem
>reasonable to you, but what about the person who makes the forfeit? If
>they really are innocent, why should they have to jump through hoops
>yet again to prove it?
If convicted their liberty may already be forfeited for some period by
imprisonment. Why should they not have to jump through hoops afterwards,
for any of the reasons that justify any sentence?
--
Caspar Bowden