Minister promises that Part III is coming
Brian Morrison
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 12 May 2006 21:12:07 +0100
--Sig_Yh5QQArzvVsPIYfHBrYV7Zx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 12 May 2006 21:04:11 +0100
"Caspar Bowden" <casparb@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>What is safe to agree, I think, is that convicted child molesters
> should
> >>be on notice to prove the innocence of their data.=20
>=20
> >It seems fashionable to view such people as sub-human, undeserving of a
> >private life, civil liberties, and any possibility of rehabilitation.
>=20
> That caricatures what I said - which is that in my view this is a
> reasonable forfeit of liberty in the circumstances
Is there such a thing as "a reasonable forfeit of liberty"? It may seem
reasonable to you, but what about the person who makes the forfeit? If
they really are innocent, why should they have to jump through hoops
yet again to prove it?
--=20
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
--Sig_Yh5QQArzvVsPIYfHBrYV7Zx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEZOwo9BNjUd4y5cURAs6xAJ9G6g92CuiSoBcmS9f9RPS0JpgjjgCdH1W7
MN0/EXeMrv9ggqKYru5Jrf8=
=CtT9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_Yh5QQArzvVsPIYfHBrYV7Zx--