Minister promises that Part III is coming
James Davis
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri, 12 May 2006 08:15:17 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Clayton wrote:
> The threat to public safety posed by terrorist use of encryption
> technology was recognised in section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2006, which
> increased the maximum penalty for the section 53 offence to five years
> in a national security case.
Possibly a daft question but I'm new to the list. Has there been a case
of terrorists using encryption? I can't think of any examples off the
top of my head, only of terrorists speaking in code.
James
- --
James Davis +44 1235 822 229 PGP: 0xC7C92EB7
JANET-CERT 0870 850 2340 (+44 1235 822 340)
Atlas Centre, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEZDYFIle3s8fJLrcRAuyXAKCPI9A60Aj6buSTvCk+HRBmMZkrsQCffsNc
2ISbLcNbd4t44Q1vphxqmfo=
=ZAKJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----