Windows guru requested - Securing Windows
Tom Thomson
ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:20:28 +0100
-----Original Message-----
From: ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk
[mailto:ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk] On Behalf Of Owen Lewis
Sent: 13 June 2006 17:20
To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Subject: RE: Windows guru requested - Securing Windows
Owen Lewis wrote:
>
> OK. We are clear then that it was the doctor that was doing the assessment
> and the sectioning and the police were in support because of the
> possibility of serious violence from the interviewee.
>
> And the end of the story is? Did the interviewee use the respite to take
> unto himself, from under the bed, a Thompson and several spare clips,
> climb to the top of a petrol storage tank next door and go to his God in a
> hail of .45 cal lead and a fireball crying out, "Top of the world, Ma!!"?
> Or did he have the 'little chat' that was required of him?
Haven't you missed out the third possibility: that the target of an
unwarranted invasion lived happily ever afterwards, without becoming an
"interviewee", the magistrate having sent the ASW away with a flea in his
ear when he applied for a section 135 order? Given the usual incompetence
of senior social workers and the quite atartling publicity that has been
given to the folly of magistrates who gave them the orders they asked for in
various alleged devil-worship and child-abuse cases in recent years, some
magistrates have become just a little more careful to look at the evidence
than they used to be. Or would you say that in suggesting that possibility
I am displaying too great a faith in the ability of magistrates to behave
sensibly?
M.