Consultation on the RIP Draft Code of Practice

[Peter Fairbrother]

Nicholas Bohm wrote:

> Peter raised the question what the Code is for.  It's fairly easy to
> read it and express views about the contents, much harder to say what's
> missing that ought to be there.


Regarding what's there that ought to be missing, I particulary enjoyed:

" 4.12 A notice cannot require any person to make a disclosure to someone
other than the person giving the notice or such other person as is specified
or identified in the notice where disclosure to another person is in
accordance with the notice. "


Early days yet.

-- 
Peter Fairbrother