Anyone know more about this BT "uk identity verification" sch eme?

Nicholas Bohm nbohm at ernest.net
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:50:04 +0000


At 16:12 20/03/2003 +0000, Ian G Batten wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Watkin Simon wrote:
>
> > > protection, and I cannot believe the civil service would miss the
> > > chance to record all the on-line votes, even if the Labour party
> > > didn't think of it first.
>
> > Can you define what you mean by "the civil service" in that context?
>
>Information is power, and who voted for whom might come in very handy.
>Since for decades the civil service has insisted, without any clear
>evidence of cases where it's been needed, that it's vital that the UK
>doesn't have a secret ballot, they must have a reason.  I don't think
>it's that they count all the votes and file them away, but I don't think
>that if that were a ten minute job the same reticence would apply.
>
>Let's turn it around, Simon.  Government insists that we cannot have a
>secret ballot.  Why shouldn't we assume the worst?  There are certainly
>credible accounts of votes for fringe parties being traced back to
>voters in the sixties.

I don't think this answers Simon's question, which seems to be "who counts 
as being in the civil service?".

I can't say what Ian meant, nor do I know what Simon was getting at - but 
would it help to suggest "servants of the Crown whose remuneration is 
provided out of money voted by Parliament other than members of the armed 
forces" just to start the point off?

Regards

Nicholas

Salkyns, Great Canfield,
Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK

Phone   01279 871272    (+44 1279 871272)
Fax     01279 870215    (+44 1279 870215)
Mobile  07715 419728 (+44 7715 419728)

PGP RSA 1024 bit public key ID: 0x08340015.  Fingerprint:
9E 15 FB 2A 54 96 24 37  98 A2 E0 D1 34 13 48 07
PGP DSS/DH 1024/3072 public key ID: 0x899DD7FF.  Fingerprint:
5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B  A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF