RIPA Debate
Ian G Batten
I.G.Batten at ftel.co.uk
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 08:38:00 +0000
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> Climbie might be one where third party information might need to
> be held, and similar situations may demand special handling for
> some of it.
A lot of the problems of Climbie were down to individuals filing
information away and not doing anything to substantiate it or act upon
it. I also would dispute if doctors should be receiving third party
information, holding it or acting upon it anyway: their intervention
would greatly complicate using the stuff evidentially. Why wouldn't a
doctor is receipt of such information pass it immediately to social
services? After all, the patient-doctor confidentiality issue isn't an
issue, as this information didn't come from the patient.
By the way, I presume you mean ``Climbie-type''. Holding Climbie up as
an example of good practice would be, well, an interesting
interpretation. Yes, I have read the report. Every page of it.
ian