A proper law
Brian Gladman
brg at gladman.plus.com
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:35:01 -0000
From: "Owen Lewis" <oml@sysrx.uk.com>
To: <ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:59 PM
Subject: RE: A proper law
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> > [mailto:ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk]On Behalf Of Brian Gladman
> > Sent: 08 March 2003 20:49
> > To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> > Subject: Re: A proper law
> >
> >
> > From: "Owen Lewis" <oml@sysrx.uk.com>
> > To: <ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:55 PM
> > Subject: RE: A proper law
> >
> >
> > > > http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~denning/crypto/cases.html
> > > >
> > > > This is a bit old now but my guess is that it is still a
> > > > reasonable summary
> > > > of the position.
> > >
> > > As you say, Dorothy is always worth reading and listening to.
> > However, in
> > > this matter, her paper that you cite hardly justifies your opinion.
> >
> > What you mean here is that in _your opinion_ this paper does not
> > justify _my
> > opinion_.
> >
> > Lets us then agree to disagree.
>
> Gladly, though my meaning remains mine own.
and which is your opinion.
Brian Gladman