A proper law
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir.org.uk
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:39:56 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:48:11 +0000 in
20030306134811.GL1422@elara.ftel.co.uk Ian G Batten
<I.G.Batten@ftel.co.uk> wrote:
> To me, far more interesting are the breaks into Fish and Tunny, which
> on the face of it are fairly strong systems. My reading of the
> published materials is that large amounts of what was done, and why,
> have not been published, perhaps with a very good reason.
I've thought that for a long time, and it is clear that while much has
surfaced about the attacks on Enigma, the other two systems seem to have
been broken by a stunning leap of logic that is not at all clear.
>
> > Perhaps one example is the exciting work being done to prove that
> > movement faster than the speed of light occurs. It's hard to
> > remember now that there were once educated people who thought the
> > movement faster than the speed of sound would be impossible.
>
> I didn't know that that theory was advanced. It'd be interesting to
> know when: the muzzle velocity of a rifle in .303 is well over 2000fps
> (speed of sound is of the order to 1000fps, depending upon altitude)
> and those were available in the late 19th century. Even .38-40 is
> supersonic under certain circumstances.
The Bell XS-1 (later the X-1) was shaped like a .50 calibre bullet for
this very reason, that a supersonic bullet exhibited stable trajectory.
The wings and tail were made as thin as possible for minimum disturbance
of this stability and minimum shock wave impingement on the control
surfaces.
- --
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Z2vM9BNjUd4y5cURAuv3AKDqulTEnI7GjtezsM86lcMf5XUstwCfZKFr
BtYr049cYog4JfOI/bqJr2A=
=HaEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----