"Blunkett u-turn on data privacy plans"

[Clive D. W. Feather]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <20030227142945.9E7F.RICHARD.COX@mandarin.org>, Richard D G 
Cox <Richard.Cox@mandarin.org> writes
>|> Other public organisations with more minor crime-fighting functions,
>|> such as local authority trading standards departments, will be
>|> included on a second, longer list of authorities allowed to access
>|> only subscriber data, such as the customers' names and addresses.
>
>Hmmm.  Interesting choice of word there ... "access"?  Could Simon tell
>us just where that concept will sit between "demand" and "request"?

I suspect that this is press wording, not Home Office. Almost certainly 
it's "demand using the powers of RIPA Part 1 Chapter 2", since that's 
what the consultation is about.

- -- 
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself  | Home: <clive@davros.org>
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work)             | Web:  <http://www.davros.org>
Fax: +44 870 051 9937                    | Work: <clive@demon.net>
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk 2.0.5

iQEVAwUBPmXvCCNAHP3TFZrhAQGzdAf9EkLGwyhjpTzt0qBNnUOKFtctEKaK08Fe
zMiOfI65Pqc0KL1v8l01mPf72N57ol8ALDoAl8nex369PxXdZpi799Fi2dQv2kKF
l2tjJP3jxUvuD0Jx8ijsl8UGUJ7X6VO9u1koWZc8cFUpLqtoM0vQRc0bXUk1Aw/v
oqRVwiwqOSNAg+SNtckLI7yKtJhMItK/ZOFn8mXXdEb+m29KZ7flsK2ujeYntdqe
7yRuMBs2rJtwULYJfKe+nbDIIyDLa+eAJpwoUFqCmBU5hSbraikxbIdSS25EWGXC
YGpLvP1x64SmBwT4shnTzqtJVyWoO4a/QCl0IGNsRIjQecJfX9n/wQ==
=WmcB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----