things and information

[Kieran]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Owen Blacker wrote:

> This would, of course, mean that police investigations couldn't prevent any
> potential further crimes being committed, in quite the same way, whilst the
> investigation were ongoing, but surely, if one assumes innocence until
> proving guilt, that's not the police's job in the first place and, if it
> were a priority to do so, a judicial warrant for seizure (rather than
> imaging) could be sought, perhaps?
>
> But this prolly wouldn't go down well with the tabloids so, doubtless, is a
> non-starter.  Or am I being too cynical for a Monday, now?  ;o)
>
<joke>
Five hoax calls saying that Mr. Dacre, Mr. Morgan, Mr. Yelland etc all
had child pr0n on their hard disks would soon fix that.
</joke>

Regards

Kieran