evolution in action (Re: Napster)
iriXx
iriXx at iriXx.org
06 Sep 2002 12:09:52 +0100
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 11:09, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > actually, from the article i'd read, Lucky's patent covers Palladium on
> > TCPA-systems as well... do you have information that is different?...
>
> Hmmm. Well, I was there at the time and I know it was a specific
> response to Microsoft's claim that Palladium doesn't do DRM, so it was
> generally aimed at Palladium rather than TCPA. However, it seems to me
> that the relevant capabilities of both are possibly sufficiently similar
> that it would apply to both.
>
> Note, though, that TCPA doesn't currently include protected I/O space,
> so is trivially vulnerable to hardware based attacks on DRM.
would you be able to give me some more detailed technical information on
how this works?... perhaps off-list, if its getting a bit OT for
everyone...
thanks
m
--
iriXx
www.iriXx.org
copyleft: creativity, technology and freedom?
info@copyleftmedia.org.uk
www.copyleftmedia.org.uk
_
( ) ascii ribbon against html email
X
/ \ cat /dev/sda1 > /dev/dsp
"Feel free to step up to the plate, but before you do, don't throw
rocks in glass houses..."
- Linus Torvalds