evolution in action (Re: Napster)

iriXx iriXx at iriXx.org
06 Sep 2002 12:09:52 +0100


On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 11:09, Ben Laurie wrote:

> > actually, from the article i'd read, Lucky's patent covers Palladium on
> > TCPA-systems as well... do you have information that is different?...
> 
> Hmmm. Well, I was there at the time and I know it was a specific 
> response to Microsoft's claim that Palladium doesn't do DRM, so it was 
> generally aimed at Palladium rather than TCPA. However, it seems to me 
> that the relevant capabilities of both are possibly sufficiently similar 
> that it would apply to both.
> 
> Note, though, that TCPA doesn't currently include protected I/O space, 
> so is trivially vulnerable to hardware based attacks on DRM.

would you be able to give me some more detailed technical information on
how this works?... perhaps off-list, if its getting a bit OT for
everyone...

thanks

m

-- 
iriXx
www.iriXx.org

copyleft: creativity, technology and freedom?
info@copyleftmedia.org.uk
www.copyleftmedia.org.uk

 _
( )  ascii ribbon against html email
 X
/ \    cat /dev/sda1 > /dev/dsp


 "Feel free to step up to the plate, but before you do, don't throw
rocks in glass houses..." 
	- Linus Torvalds