Momey laundering scams
David Hansen
davidh at spidacom.co.uk
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 09:27:13 +0100
On 4 Sep 2002 at 18:05, Richard Clayton wrote:
> you're asking an operational question (viz: which crimes will they
> investigate and what resources will they deploy in doing so)
>
> IME, they don't answer such questions on the record (for a pretty
> obvious reason)
There are several obvious reasons. One of them is that they don't
want to be embarrassed by revealing the groups whose crimes they
choose to ignore and those that they choose to do something on.
An example is in the past down south, when opening supermarkets on
Sunday was illegal. The police were perfectly happy to ignore
illegally open supermarkets and turn up to these illegally operating
shops and help the staff in these illegally open shops deal with
thieves. This is just one example of the police taking the side of
rich and powerful. People shouldn't be surprised by this, that is the
main reason Mr Peel set up the modern police.
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
I will *always* explain why I revoke a key, unless the UK
government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000.