Comms data requests by C&E & the Inland Revenue
John R T Brazier
prunesquallor at proproco.co.uk
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:55:32 +0100
JB said:
>> Surely this is gibberish?
Richard responded>
> only slightly
> the Met has served notices headed "DPA 29(3)" which have informed data
> controllers about crimes that are being investigated.
Quite right - I'd actually misread John Denham's reply - the perils of late
night discussions!
TTFN
John B
The data controllers have then voluntarily released information.
I've posted about this process several times this week : have a look at
some of my other messages in that large thread you may have been
delaying catching up on till the weekend :)
>IANAL, but this seems a refreshing approach. The DPA was meant to be about
>Data Protection, not Data Exploitation.
>
>And, of course, as Richard pointed out, 127K vs 155K, what's 20% between
>friends? Amazing, given that these numbers ultimately come from the same
>organization - or do they?
they do of course cover different periods -- one being the year to July
and the other being a year to ... well Simon didn't say
if there's any overlap in the periods then of course the change will not
be 20% per annum :)
- --
richard Richard Clayton
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
iQA/AwUBPbjxoBfnRQV/feRLEQLaEACfQigE1bXotBlOhgXkANPu7fqB9sMAnRV3
Z1J3hE4lBf/6Njua5qg1G2xF
=t014
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----