Reverse Burdens

[Owen Blacker]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter (Fairbrother?):
> 
> >[...] henceforth the aforementioned party of the first subject to clause
> >4(a) subsection 2 paragraph 3(c) shall [...]
> 
> These things are usually quite interesting, but also quite impenetrable.
> Would it be possible to provide a 1-2 sentence English translation when
> posting them?

I was just thinking the same thing.

Having just skim read the Lawtel post (and worsened my headache in the
bargain  *GRIN*), I ~think~ that court decided that the reversed burden of
proof was ~not~ a contravention of the Human Rights Act.

Could someone more legally-minded confirm my reading of that, please?  :)


O x
- -- 
Owen Blacker
Senior Software Developer and InfoSecurity Consultant   Wheel: Group
See http://www.owens-place.org.uk/pgp.html -- more about my PGP keys
Sig  0xa7cb7592 | 9c1c 2996 075b 2daa 3660  6d2f ee34 fc94 a7cb 7592

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
Comment: Pls see http://www.owens-place.org.uk/pgp.html about my keys

iQA/AwUBPd4RZ+40/JSny3WSEQLcFwCfQTdS7agax5AtZ9Kse6wXPEEuue4Ani7c
rqM7n9OHJ4k7iZFychFK2svf
=IOXJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.