What is Communications Data?
Ian G Batten
I.G.Batten at ftel.co.uk
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:27:21 +0000
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Roland Perry wrote:
> In message <012438016373D411A0F300508BBD04A5022EB8EF@L01EB006>, Watkin
> Simon <Simon.Watkin@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk> writes
> >If an e-mail with content in the headers were lawfully intercepted it's not
> >an issue. Where the e-mail (or a copy of it) is on a server at an ISP, and
> >is no longer in the course of its transmission, the proper means access
> >would not be under Pt I Chapter II of RIPA but a Production Order.
>
> This is a rather novel approach. Pt1 Ch2 is normally regarded as about
> disclosure of comms data that's been logged (and retained), without any
> reference to the current state of delivered-ness of the content
> associated with it.
Is mail sat on a server at an ISP ``in transmission'' or not? I'd argue
that stuff sat in /var/spool/mqueue (or its moral equivalent) was
definitely ``in transmission''. What about stuff which is in a mailbox
accessible via POP/IMAP?
ian