SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT v PAUL OWEN & ORS (2002)
Martin Keegan
mk270 at cam.ac.uk
Fri, 17 May 2002 10:09:47 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Derek Fawcus wrote:
> > In other words you can only do the things section 50C allows if you have a
> > license and the license does NOT explicitly prohibit you doing them.
>
> As Tom mentioned, you're assuming that such an binding agreement is in
> force.
Don't conflate licences with contracts. A copyright licence has no element
of "agreement" in it, it's whatever the rightholder says it is.
> In the absence of such an agreement, I have the default rights given by
> the copyright act, which do allow such copying. By vitue of the 'or
> otherwise' in the definition of lawful use.
No, you don't have a right to copy under the CDPA. You have a defence to
an action brought for copyright infringement.
> So the question is 'is there an "agreement" in force'.
No.
[etc]
Mk