BBC medical records story

Ben Clifford benc at hawaga.org.uk
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:32:17 -0800 (PST)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Peter Gutmann wrote:

> >The idea of the NHS bureacracy looking after my medical records is, IMO, a
> >"complete non-starter". But that is how they are looked after.
>
> Centrally-administered records are a non-starter for political or philosophical
> reasons, while patient-administered records are a non-starter for technical and
> practical reasons.  There's a slight difference.

No, centrally-administeed records are a non-starter for practical reasons.

My only medical records that are not lost are:
   i) my vaccination record
  ii) a copy of my hayfever prescription

By sheer co-incidence, those are also exactly the medical records that I
am in physical possession of.

- -- 
Ben Clifford     benc@hawaga.org.uk     GPG: 30F06950
http://www.hawaga.org.uk/ben/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8lfp0sYXoezDwaVARAvM3AJ4xk7l/Uwxqrm1/AqXoVP0G2oXcfwCeK4Vo
rklbpskw7xKZc7zFyKNCQf4=
=wxsa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----