New RIPA ammendment(s) probably coming in "autumn"

Richard Clayton richard at highwayman.com
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:29:25 +0100


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <3D44E446.5D56@dmed.demon.co.uk>, Peter Mitchell
<pete@dmed.demon.co.uk> writes

>Roland Perry wrote:
>> 
>> Given that RIPA was introduced to satisfy the Human Rights Act, 
>
>So now RIPA was introduced to satisfy the Human Rights Act!

yes indeed - and if you go back to the June 1999 consultation you'll
find significant mention of it (and indeed quotes of relative parts)

If this is coming as a surprise to you, then you probably need to do a
little more homework before commenting :-(

In particular, Part II (which we hardly speak of here) codified standard
policing actions and it was essential that this was in force before the
HRA came into effect in October 2000.

>I am getting that strange feeling, so common under a Blair government,
>that history is being rewritten in front of me. 

Well, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/oicd/interint.htm appears to have the
same content as when I last looked at it - perhaps you could indicate
the changes ?

- -- 
richard                                              Richard Clayton

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.         Benjamin Franklin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBPUT85RfnRQV/feRLEQJM/gCdF5FZ5UBuwHeaKEa1Up9n8t7/HG8AoO1z
0GcrAbldcI5bGSGXca1nhyUN
=r7Y+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----