contempt of court

[Graham]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 23 Aug 2002 4:58 pm, MS wrote:

> I would agree with you given -this- example, Graham.
>
>
> BUT: =20
> there is a clear difference between being ordered -NOT- to do
> something then choosing to do it and
> being ordered -TO- do something that may well be impossible
> (forgotten keys)
>
>
> Now, where did I put that t'pence h'penny...?
>
>
> M.

I totally agree with you.  Maybe contempt of court should NOT cover this=20
eventuality, but the original poster seemed to suggest the the Contempt=20
of Court system was basically wrong.

I don't think so.
- --=20

Graham
GPG Key ID: E935DB9D

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Please sign and encrypt for internet privacy

iD8DBQE9Zs5gIwtBZOk1250RAkinAKCNCzEnwradDXSV8rwFXZjqddblEACgshBf
ibMyLrNaw7kRYVNCyxlIXnU=3D
=3D4v/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----