Status of Cryptography Research in implementation of the EUCD
Owen Lewis
oml at sysrx.uk.com
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:55:15 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> [mailto:ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk]On Behalf Of Graham Murray
> Sent: 14 August 2002 06:57
> To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> Subject: Re: Status of Cryptography Research in implementation of the
> EUCD
> How does Z prove that the information is "*intended* to enable or
> assist ..". It should be much easier for the researcher to show that
> the intention of publication is intended to increase the security of
> email and web users than for Z to show the intention to assist
> breaking the copy protection. That assumes that Z could even
> demonstrate that the researcher even knew that Z used X as part of
> its copy protection.
We are not considering a publication of abstract principles but of specified
weaknesses in named code. Do be able do this, the researcher has had his
head well and truly 'under the bonnet' of that proprietary code and will not
easily be able to show otherwise. In the case of a copy protection
algorithm, it will be unique to its owner.
Owen