R v (1) GRAHAM WESTGARTH SMITH (2) MIKE JAYSON (2002)

Peter Mitchell pete at dmed.demon.co.uk
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:47:40 +0100


Roland Perry wrote:
>
> In message <3CC90F58.7FC5@dmed.demon.co.uk>, Peter Mitchell
> <pete@dmed.demon.co.uk> writes
>
> >You actually have to collect evidence to decide that kind of claim,
> >rather than relying on the prevalence of belief in a proposition.
>
> I was careful to mention that these beliefs are widely held by those
> working with the offenders. Doubters are welcome to do alternative
> research.

By "alternative" do you mean that there is already good research
evidence supporting this theory? If so, we don't need to worry about
what the social workers do or don't believe about it, especially in
view of their record in the Great Satanic Abuse Fiasco.

--
Pete Mitchell