Business on Straw

Donald ramsbottom donald at ramsbottom.co.uk
Wed, 03 Oct 2001 11:23:36 +0100


From CW360:

http://www.cw360asp.com/eb/eb.asp?b=3D303&a=3D106429&f=3D1&i=3D256108



>                   Business groups deny Straw's accusation=20
>                   by  Bruce Ackland=20
>                   Tuesday 2 October 2001=20
>
>                   Business organisations have reacted with anger and=
 concern
>                   to Foreign Secretary Jack Straw's claim that opponents
of the
>                   Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA)
undermined the
>                   fight against terrorism.=20
>
>                   Straw last week branded opponents of Internet=
 surveillance
>                   legislation as "na=EFve" and claimed that the changes to
RIPA they
>                   had forced on the government weakened its ability to
intercept
>                   communications from terrorists.
>
>                   The e.centre, an e-business trade group, was=
 particularly
>                   angered by the former home secretary's statement=20
>
>                   E.centre's managing director Alan Boxer said: "Who does=
 Mr
>                   Straw think has been na=EFve in this regard? I certainly
do not
>                   accept that e.centre and our 16,000 corporate members
from all
>                   industrial sectors deserve to be accused.=20
>
>                   "The e.centre has always supported the government's
policy in
>                   trying to establish an interception regime to police
threats to the
>                   economic well-being of the UK. But when government
requires
>                   communication service providers to set up systems which
are
>                   technically not feasible, it is only right that
industry points out the
>                   unworkable nature of such a strategy," he added.
>
>                   The Institute of Directors (IoD) said tactics used in
fighting the
>                   RIP Act would have to be reconsidered following the
attacks on
>                   the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.
>
>                   Richard Barron, policy unit director of the IoD, said:
"The events
>                   of 11 September have put a different complexion on the
debate.
>                   It changes the whole nature of the argument. There will
be more
>                   data interception and therefore more burdens on=
 companies.
>
>                   "I would hope against a knee-jerk reaction from the
government,
>                   but we totally understand the need for heightened
anti-terror
>                   legislation. I just hope the government can be clear
about what
>                   they plan to do."
>
>                   Pamela Taylor, senior e-business policy adviser at the
>                   Confederation of British Industry, added: "We are as
concerned
>                   about terrorism as the government, but we would urge
caution
>                   when it comes to increased data interception. The
events in the
>                   US demonstrated that business is a key target for
terrorists and
>                   we hope that in response to this the government will
continue to
>                   seek a balance between new anti-terror legislation and
>                   business interests


Donald Ramsbottom BA LLb (Hons) PGdip
Ramsbottom & Co Solicitors
Internet and Global Encryption Law Specialists & General UK  Law Matters
5 Seagrove Avenue Hayling Island Hampshire UK
Tel (44) 023 9246 5931 Fax (44) 023 9246 8349
Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of Investment business
Service by Fax or Email NOT accepted