e-conveyancing
Charles Lindsey
Charles Lindsey <chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk>
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:49:42 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:46:37 +0100
Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net> said...
> The underlying problem is precisely the limited security of private keys
> once in widespread use for valuable purposes.
Which is why the timestamping becomes so important. If the timestamp
shows that you signed the document before such a date, then it matters
not whether your key becomes lost or compromised after that date.
There would be much to be said for letting the land registry act as the
principal timestamper for these particular purposes (probably as well as
and not in lieu of other timestamps).
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5