Silicon.com: 'Unworkable' Snooping laws delayed for third time
Owen Blacker
owen.blacker at wheel.co.uk
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:12:44 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> HEADLINE: 'Unworkable' Snooping laws delayed for third time
> PUBLISHED: 6:25pm on Friday 2nd March 2001
> CHANNEL: Power brokers
> AUTHOR: Suzanna Kerridge
> SERVICE: http://www.silicon.com
>
> TEXT OF STORY FOLLOWS:
>
> The UK Home Office has pushed back the publication of the
> code of practice designed to govern the day-to-day operation
> of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act.
>
> The code of practice, without which the Act is unusable, has
> already been delayed three times thanks to a wave of protests
> from the high-tech industry.
>
> Sally Low, policy advisor at the British Chambers of
> Commerce, said: "They have put back the process because the
> Commission has been inundated with comments. The most
> criticism has been received from businesses claiming the code
> places an enormous burden on them and is unworkable."
>
> David Smith, information commission registrar, confirmed the
> reports. "We received more comments than expected and the
> process of going through them all is taking longer than
> originally thought," he said.
>
> Smith admitted the majority of responses accused the code of
> being too restrictive on employers. He said the commission
> was taking the concerns into consideration when drafting the code.
>
> But Yamen Akdeniz, director of Cyber Rights and Cyber
> Liberties, questioned whether the delay was due to conflicts
> in the code with regulations set down in RIP.
>
> He told silicon.com: "RIP is a complex issue that needs to be
> balanced with the Data Protection Commission's codes. The Act
> deals with interception of email while the Data Commission
> comes into practice once the data has been stored. The
> problem is that these two issues conflict and I don't know if
> there will ever be a unified code."
>
> One peer opposing the legislation, Lord John Cope, was not
> surprised by the delay.
>
> "This has happened because it is more complicated than they
> originally realised. They now have to get the wet towels out
> and do some more careful thinking.
> "The whole process of RIP has been like this. The government
> starts off by over-simplifying the idea and when they look at
> it in detail they see it is far more complicated. It doesn't
> surprise me in the least."
>
> The BCC's Low criticised the UK government's handling of
> ecommerce legislation, and claimed: "This is one issue we're
> fighting with the Data Commission as it is like using a
> sledgehammer to crack a nut. The UK is very good at overdoing
> regulations on the ecommerce side of things."
>
> For related news, see:
> 'Snooping Bill' will be law by October says Peer
> http://www.silicon.com/a38583
> 'Snooping Bill' enters last lap as opposition unites
> http://www.silicon.com/a38538
> Snooping Bill is passed and present
> http://www.silicon.com/a38806
>
> To see this article:- http://www.silicon.com/a43048
>
> STORY ENDS
>
> For more information on silicon.com go to http://www.silicon.com.
>
> silicon.com - the who, what, when, where and why of ebusiness
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
Comment: Due to RIP, pls check for revocation before using this key!
iQA/AwUBOqS4E1VeQSYAA2h0EQJ7mwCffM/Sz4XjtF228OOyOyQ6BpseP7YAoIEr
dR3aH+KmpxX3a9E3Rr6occ53
=vLel
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/