R v.Lambert House of Lords and RIP reverse-burden-of-proof

[Owen Lewis]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> [mailto:ukcrypto-admin@chiark.greenend.org.uk]On Behalf Of Adrian
> Midgley
> Sent: 11 July 2001 17:21
> To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
> Subject: Re: R v.Lambert House of Lords and RIP reverse-burden-of-proof
>
>
> From: Owen Lewis <oml@eloka.demon.co.uk>
>
> >> sending him some enciphered material (having created
> >> a key in his name which I later discard).
> >
> >This is one reason why PGP as 'strong cryptography for the masses' is
> a
> >flawed system. You would not be able to do this to me or to many
> others,
> >only to those who lay themselves open to this form of abuse.
> >
> >Owen
>
> That appears to be trivially easy to do, to me.  What am I missing?

I get unsolicited enciphered mail I return it to sender. I get a second I
return it with a cease and desist message. A third and mail delivery to me
will be blocked.


There also requires to be a criminal conspiracy sufficiently convincing to
get a notice served on me.

Don't think so some how but feel free to put it to the test, if you'd really
want to risk the prison sentence that may lie at the end of such a ploy.

Owen