> It was deliberate[1] . > It follows the thread > "Re: R v.Lambert House of Lords and RIP reverse-burden-of-proof" > I didn't think it was that opaque. > [1] But it would be hard to prove that, of course. In that case, shouldn't you have uploaded the key to the keyservers so we could see who it was aimed at ?(JackBootStraw@uk.gov would be a good choice :)