RIPA

Richard Clayton richard at highwayman.com
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:24:51 +0000


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <B6B54FC9.1180%peter.fairbrother@ntlworld.com>, Peter
Fairbrother <peter.fairbrother@ntlworld.com> writes

>I haven't got a copy of RIPA to hand, 

try   http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/20000023.htm

>but doesn't it say that evidence that
>suggests that an order for interception has been made can't be introduced?

up to a point

>So if they ask you for keys to an interception and you refuse, how can they
>prosecute you for failing to comply if they can't introduce evidence that an
>interception has taken place?

they would invoke S18(1)(a)

>I might be being silly here, apologies if I am.

rather more directly, they can also prosecute you for failing to
implement a S8 warrant ... and clearly to do that they will need to tell
the court about the contents of the warrant.

the Act has deep flaws -- this is not one

- -- 
richard                     richard.clayton  @  h i g h w a y m a n . com

"Assembly of Japanese bicycle require great peace of mind" quoted in ZAMM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBOo+/ExfnRQV/feRLEQLzEQCdF9gtzz8QaENhES2AUMMMeKhd9u4AoM+J
sT7l0AfZUogyx91x5j0ZNra/
=B756
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----