Why "carnivore" type systems can't be (entirely) open source
Roland Perry
roland at linx.net
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:23:34 +0000
In message <010201c0949c$895482c0$3e0a989e@eloka>, Owen Lewis
<oml@eloka.demon.co.uk> writes
>
>At the outset, ISTR that data via GSM was as unusual as via modem?
Analogue cellphones used normal modems, albeit in the rather unusual
format for then - a PCMCIA card. The best data rate to choose was 4,800,
which actually worked better than some of the slower rates. 9600 was out
of the question.
When Digital arrived, there were slightly different "modem" cards, which
were really rate adapters. But most early data was done by SMS and even
schemes which sent emails by concatenating several SMS messages.
>The early
>adopters were those keenies who had been using custom tailored acoustic
>couplers for years (probably running at 300 bps).
I never did use an acoustic modem with a mobile of either kind. The
first message I sent by "rate adapter" modem card on a GSM phone was in
October 1994; I still have the email - it was to a cc:mail gateway run
by CompuServe. Having proved the technology (the people I was
demonstrating it to were rather amazed that the phone, PDA, software and
modem were all straight out of the box) after that it was always "just
money" to buy the toys and fund the airtime.
>Even now, datacom via GSM
>is less than ideal. 9600 suks OK.
Yes, it's not that good, which is why I use a 28.8K GSM card these days
(Nokia Data Card with airtime from Orange).
--
Roland Perry | tel: +44 1733 207705 | roland@linx.org
Interim CEO | fax: +44 1733 207729 | http://www.linx.net
London Internet Exchange | mbl: +44 7050 604080 | /contact/roland