PKC

Owen Blacker ukcrypto at maillist.ox.ac.uk
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:06:16 +0100


 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Moving somewhat off-topic, I'm not sure that the level of detail you
suggest would *ever* be considered ethical, however.  Take the
example of the HIV pandemic and move back to the early/mid '80s --
would you really consider it appropriate to compel the release of
details of who's slept with whom?  AFAIAA, all the HIV workers I know
would probably disagree with you and I can't think of another way in
which your comments could be interpreted...

Anonymised data should, of course, be made available.  Indeed, I can
get these data already -- I subscribe to the CDC newsletters (/MMWR/
weekly; /MMWR HIV/, /EID/ and /HIV Serosurveillance/ less frequently)
which are conveniently delivered to me by email which are emailed to
me.

Am I missing your point?   :o)


O x
- -----
Owen Blacker
Senior Internet Developer and InfoSec Consultant, pres.co
!!!  New PGP keys -- see http://www.owens-place.org.uk/pgp.html  !!!
Sig  0x00036874 | d39f b776 fa20 c125 b0e2  aa6d 555e 4126 0003 6874
- -----
DISCLAIMER: These views are mine own and do not represent those of
any other organisation I may seem to represent including, but not
limited to, pres.co, Primecom or any of their clients.
- -----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Brown [mailto:k.brown@ccs.bbk.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: ukcrypto@maillist.ox.ac.uk; cyber-rights-UK@cyber-rights.org
> Subject: Re: PKC

[deletia]

> The big exception is obviously epidemiology/disease control where,
> for interests of public health & self-defence society (or at any
> rate the government) might need to demand personal data, which
> could be just notification but might be as detailed as who ate what
> or who slept with whom. These issues are going to get more
> important as infectious disease once again becomes more significant
> (in rich countries - the poor didn't have our 50 year antibiotic
> holiday from serious infection of course).  There are perhaps
> circumstances in which it is right for public bodies to demand full
> details of an infection & so would in the limit have to be able to
> force medical professionals  to divulge details of patients (cue
> old Typhoid Mary films...)  
> 
> Ken

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
Comment: Due to RIP, pls check for revocation before using this key!

iQA/AwUBOdCteFVeQSYAA2h0EQIjWwCg7kYoVWmGJx4wdEu+mMhuE2QGdfAAoMZ5
Z6+CxSSOI0owccBM1SWHlhtr
=QVv9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/