Army signals security & "Clansmen" series radios

David Hansen ukcrypto at maillist.ox.ac.uk
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:30:00 +0100


On 6 Sep 00, at 11:50, Owen Lewis wrote:

> In sum, your view (which is a natural corollary to the popular
> misconception of France's (non)participation in NATO) is entirely
> mistaken.

Not according to your earlier posting.

> One of the interesting points to ponder is whether - and if not why
> not - the diplomats and military have not seized upon the invention of
> public key ciphers, now 30 years old, as the single, simple and secure
> solution to replace other more complex and expensive cipher systems.

Because sound bite solutions are the realm of party politicians, 
journalists and others with a limited grasp of a subject.

In any field of endeavour that I can think of (and which I have a 
reasonable knowledge of) "the single, simple and secure solution" is 
an illusion chased after by those with little knowledge. That's why 
PGP does not just use public key ciphers.



 David Hansen | davidh@spidacom.co.uk  | PGP email preferred
 Edinburgh    | CI$ number 100024,3247 | key number F566DA0E