Earliest ref. to reverse-burden/onus-of proof ? (was RE: Clarke Open Letter in Telegraph Connected..)

[Ian G Batten]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_953890109-20368-0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Md5: LYKNIsM6HLy+kSQ4m/HS9A==

> "stronger law enforcement" and it may be buried in "project Trawler" I
> confess I have not looked for the offending Trawler. But as the PIU

I thought an absolute principle in the spook community was to have code
names that were utterly unrelated to the thing they stand for, to
prevent intelligence being gathers based solely on the name.  If NCIS
want a ``Trawler'', do we presume it was just the next word on the list
of covernames, or do we presume they want to Trawl for Intelligence?  My
money's on the latter.

ian

------------=_953890109-20368-0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: PGP Information

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: P+NJmTar22PC3FFe04GxleLzBkVqLHR0

iQB1AwUBONs1Pcoy0yij3IvtAQEgYQL/a8pV9Az65kFNG08YyOub88Vs3rx/QFJ3
WqUjJs5cUl8+iieKLVWjvj/Pq2GIhlJjAK2xb4Jge1HkCXz6XbIMLnvn+0YV6AWK
h1mVAYZeyWLT7lXkIR9gpq2a9/q5NvLn
=L/A7
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
------------=_953890109-20368-0--