RIP FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: HOME OFFICE RESPONSE TO UKCRYPTO

[Ian G Batten]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_953303890-382-0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Md5: 0CQ24CBVIYkpjO4UYzXOcQ==

> are to be deployed do not form part of the Bill itself.  The UK's law
> enforcement, security and intelligence agencies already have appropriate
> security measures in place to protect sensitive intelligence and/or
> evidential material.

Sensitive intelligence such as, for example, the list of people who gave
information to the police in the aftermath of the murder of Stephen
Lawrence, information which the Home Office calmly placed on its website
for public download?  Ah, yes, that makes me feel better.  Sensitive
information Jack Straw promised wouldn't be released, such as medical
reports on ageing dictators, plastered all over the papers within 48
hours?

ian

------------=_953303890-382-0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: PGP Information

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: f35pzt2F9vfPetI/EAhp5be5cneGEkLc

iQB1AwUBONJDUsoy0yij3IvtAQHJKgMA0WPoOF81QsuvKUVslDB/3wKW6dp37B5B
68syaiXt/q0eOwNDq2tUAexjgpaQOsphHSXtXAnTIQjZEU9ZAqkbVIU9ifLupZaz
bbUFYl6VuhI7sIWrxpmNvVNnpCMrxpBX
=0cSQ
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
------------=_953303890-382-0--