Unfinished Business

[Owen Blacker]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

No, more money being wasted on the innocent people who *might* have
received an email from someone who is *suspected* of being a criminal.

It's a big difference, and one that seems to escape the Home Office at
the moment, but one that should *definitely* be made very clear by
anyone doing Newsnight / Right to Reply / whatever...


O x
- -----
Owen Blacker
Senior Internet Developer and InfoSec Consultant, pres.co
DSS: 0x7e3c8eab | 2f45 c60d 6a0a 0007 193d  d994 cd36 e021 7e3c 8eab
RSA: 0x38fee6c3 |      7c41 e69c 5b8a 484d  22af 1859 f4c9 307b

- -----Original Message-----
From: Communications Admin [mailto:commz@verge.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 8:16 AM
To: ukcrypto
Subject: Re: Unfinished Business


[deletia]

Killing criminals is cost effective in both the short and long term;
it
saves on legal fees and prison costs. The bean counters can live with
that
but what your asking is they spend as much as the keys owners; more
money
being wasted on criminals.

[deletia]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQA/AwUBOVHOEs024CF+PI6rEQLHigCfR9V9bQzR0ftEOxV0nep0IsLHhnMAoOVU
MhihS1mu2Dn6egz/wIBHg7Ki
=5ics
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered 
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/