BAD NEWS :( Government amendments reinforce Big Browser
Jeremy Stein
jeremyestein at yahoo.co.uk
Wed, 07 Jun 2000 21:20:34 +0100
>The amendement to S.2 below seems absolutely to clarify that comms data
>INCLUDES signals for the actuation of apparatus, i.e the full http string,
>and therefore that conduct in relation to it DOES NOT constitute
>interception - therefore no warrant is required.
>
>Therefore Big Browser is very much alive folks...
Are http requests encrypted during an SSL session, or is it only the actual
data that is encrypted? If the former, would this mean that if an
anonymous web browsing proxy equipped with SSL was used, the only
information that could be gathered by interception would be that you were
connected to that particular proxy?
Jeremy
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com