Charles Clarke and paedophiles
Yaman Akdeniz
lawya at lucs-01.novell.leeds.ac.uk
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:12:27 +0100
On 30 Jul 2000, at 18:20, Roland Perry wrote:
> Which aim: the running of a hotline (which seems to me indisputable),
Hotlines are very much disputable regardless of what you believe.
Civil liberties organisations all around the world do disagree with
privatised policing organisations like Internet hotlines where
Internet content is being removed from ISP servers without due
process.
>or
> the involvement in discussion about wider child protection issues
> regarding the internet (which has been acknowledged in Hansard).
Well you may convince those who are not so familiar with what the IWF
does but you will not convince me as the IWF remains as an
unaccountable private organisation with important "public duties". Of
course such an unaccountable body fits well with the Government and
yes the IWF is supported in the political arena but that does not
mean that it is accountable to the public or whether members of the
public can challenge its decisions. I am not even going into the
issue of whether the "hotline" is effective in "cleaning the
Internet" from child pornography.
Mr. Yaman Akdeniz,
Director, Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK)
Url: http://www.cyber-rights.org
E-mail: lawya@cyber-rights.org
Tel: +44 (0) 498 865116
PGP Fingerprint:
075A 1640 8F7A 0273 6C24 B9C3 551F A9F1 0397 F663