PIU report and human rights: e-commerce Bill
Nicholas Bohm
nbohm at ernest.net
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:41:44 +0100
At 12:09 PM 6/21/1999 +0100, Brian Gladman wrote:
>
>From: Nicholas Bohm <nbohm@ernest.net>
>To: <ukcrypto@maillist.ox.ac.uk>
>Sent: 21 June 1999 9:46 AM
>Subject: Re: PIU report and human rights: e-commerce Bill
>> At 08:06 AM 6/21/1999 +0100, lists@notatla.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> >matthew-l@itconsult.co.uk (Matthew Richardson):
>> At 08:06 AM 6/21/1999 +0100, lists@notatla.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> >matthew-l@itconsult.co.uk (Matthew Richardson):
>> >
>> >> An ISP seeking to claim copyright over someone's private email would
>> >> seem to present a significant number of issues!
>> >
>> >> I have tried searching for the text of the offending terms and
>> >> conditions, but have failed to locate them. Does anyone have a URL?
>> >
>> >
>> >No, but you can see this on www.ibm.com....
>> >
>> > IBM does not want to receive confidential or proprietary information
>> > from you through our Web site. Please note that any information or
>> > material sent to IBM will be deemed NOT to be confidential. By sending
>> > IBM any information or material, you grant IBM an unrestricted,
>> > irrevocable license to use, reproduce, display, perform, modify,
>> > transmit and distribute those materials or information, and you also
>> > agree that IBM is free to use any ideas, concepts, know-how or
>> > techniques that you send us for any purpose. ....
>> >
>> >I dislike the 'irrevocable' in the above paragraph, given the
>> >revoke-for-no-reason provision of the postfix licence.
>>
>> It is at least much more reasonable than the alleged virgin.net terms.
>>
>
>Still not acceptable though. For an ISP to claim free use of anything that
>they happen to display to the world when acting on behalf of a customer is
>scandalous. It is quite common to see web pages offering software for which
>commercial use involves a license and a fee. The above terms would allow IBM
>to use this code for free. Not an ISP I would want to do business with!
I don't think these are IBM's terms for acting as an ISP (if they were, I
would agree with you). I think they are what IBM are saying to those who
communicate with them in response to an IBM web page. In that context
their terms make better sense.
Regards,
Nicholas Bohm
Salkyns, Great Canfield,
Takeley, Bishop's Stortford CM22 6SX, UK
Phone 01279 871272 (+44 1279 871272)
Fax 01279 870215 (+44 1279 870215)
Mobile 0860 636749 (+44 860 636749)
PGP RSA 1024 bit public key ID: 0x08340015. Fingerprint:
9E 15 FB 2A 54 96 24 37 98 A2 E0 D1 34 13 48 07
PGP DSS/DH 1024/3072 public key ID: 0x899DD7FF. Fingerprint:
5248 1320 B42E 84FC 1E8B A9E6 0912 AE66 899D D7FF