Administrivia: Re: Swedish Certification Authority

T Bruce Tober octobersdad at reporters.net
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 04:33:13 +0000


In message <199803250022.AAA04680@server.eternity.org>, Adam Back
<aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes
>
>Paul argued for reply-to on the basis that it stimulates discussion,

And so it does. The errant reply to the list is not that often seen,
though in the eyes of the senders (and I've been one on another list) it
can be one too many or at least seem that way because of the
embarrassment it can cause. But the other way (replay to author) is also
a pia in that one is (and I speak for myself) constantly forgetting that
th4e response is going only to the author and great thoughts and
contributions to the on-going discussion are lost. I would rather the
infrequent embarassment of a private letter sent to the list than a
public contribution not made.

It's really easy to hit delete on messages you don't want to bother with
and by just reading the subj or author line you can usually tell which
those are at a glance. And yes, I know, one should never just a message
by its cover.




tbt -- Sign all messages with non-escrowed keys, don't give in to government 
tyrany. Commentary at http://www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/crecon/Escrow.htm

-- 
|Bruce Tober, octobersdad@reporters.net, Birmingham, England +44-121-242-3832|
|       Freelance PhotoJournalist - IT, Business, The Arts and lots more     |
|               Website - http://www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/crecon/         |
|                          PGP Key Details follow:                           |
| RSA key ID 0x94F48255 Fingerprint 0907 EBCD 1B37 91F5  D15C 0D2E C617 2671 |
| DSS/DH key ID 0xB1445118                                                   |
| DSS/DH key Fingerprint CBB5 8BF8 2CCC 9B86 41EB  1788 6930 78FB B144 5118  |