legislating the impossible? (Re: Encrypting to self)

[Carl Ellison]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

We haven't explored this in detail, but I can just imagine the technical 
paper (for a stego conference?) about how to hide evidence from the cops 
with plausible deniability.

"Those are just random." works, of course.

How about having a file which really is a uSoft executable, but contains 
encrypted padding?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNZ5OoBN3Wx8QwqUtAQGG9QP+J5pC0wyylRu/K74DJu3dWD9/HB5sjtdI
xMbDGGtG0m5NfcnUyV5BHP5V/GsG+rdyT2Zrk4oXGOEpfNNHzXDtdcxoMPZtQxCa
dIFHgZfpQPs9v5dcGi0Wtq38wouiSEiIadXoBtlugFoaJ2uOl+3Q0s/qgcJ9GT1M
SBwQmBWL4Is=
=T6Jc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison       cme@acm.org    http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|    PGP: 08FF BA05 599B 49D2  23C6 6FFD 36BA D342                 |
+-Officer, officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a dirty song.--+