[git-remote-gcrypt] --force proposal

Jay Colson jay at karma.net
Mon May 18 13:04:08 BST 2020


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Sean,
  My apologies in regards to the sign-off.  That has been rectified here
- -->
https://github.com/spwhitton/git-remote-gcrypt/pull/4/commits/162d1b8aa7aac8a54aee1200af6db9b624c90f84


Cheers,
Jay Colson

On 2020-05-17 at 21:37, spwhitton at spwhitton.name wrote:
> Hello Jay,
>
> On Fri 15 May 2020 at 12:20AM +01, Jay Colson wrote:
>
> >
https://github.com/spwhitton/git-remote-gcrypt/pull/4/commits/2e9472a680b8b37af3b6cd79ae1731167d2991ad

> >
> > pr to get reminded that we should --force pushes ... as each is
> > 'really' a [force] push (according to documentation), this seems like
> > a way to 'remind' users of that
>
> I can't apply this patch since it is not signed off.  Please see
> CONTRIBUTING.rst.
>
> Stepping back: the proposal is to require explicitly passing --force for
> pushes since all pushes with git-remote-gcrypt implicitly have --force.
>
> I am not sure this is a great idea, because if someone fixes
> git-remote-gcrypt so that it does not always force-push, users who have
> hardcoded --force into their scripts will not be able to benefit from
> that.
>
> I'd like to get feedback from other users.  I've CCed Joey as the
> maintainer of git-annex, which is the source of a lot of
> git-remote-gcrypt's users.
>
> --
> Sean Whitton
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: FlowCrypt 7.7.7 Gmail Encryption
Comment: Seamlessly send and receive encrypted email
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=XRCA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x841ECE89C918B527.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 19306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/sgo-software-discuss/attachments/20200518/470ab85f/attachment-0001.key>


More information about the sgo-software-discuss mailing list