[PATCH 09/31] site: Permit multiple peer addresses even if peer is static
Ian Jackson
ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Sat Sep 20 01:32:04 BST 2014
This is necessary to permit multiple addresses of multiple address
families. We (arbitrarily) set the default limit to 3.
Abolish the MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX constant and size the peer addresses
array by MAX_PEER_ADDRS directly.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
---
README | 3 +++
site.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 94334b3..962755e 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ site: dict argument
their contact addresses might both change at once. [false]
mobile-peers-max (integer): Maximum number of peer port/addr pairs we
remember and send to. Must be at least 1 and no more than 5. [3]
+ static-peers-max (integer): Maximum number of peer port/addr pairs
+ we can try for a static site. Must be at least 1 and no more
+ than 5. [3]
mobile-peer-expiry (integer): For "mobile" peers only, the length
of time (in seconds) for which we will keep sending to multiple
address/ports from which we have not seen incoming traffic. [120]
diff --git a/site.c b/site.c
index b48567a..f339d16 100644
--- a/site.c
+++ b/site.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#define DEFAULT_MOBILE_PEER_EXPIRY (2*60) /* [s] */
#define DEFAULT_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX 3 /* send at most this many copies (default) */
+#define DEFAULT_STATIC_PEERS_MAX 3 /* retain at most this many peer addresses */
/* Each site can be in one of several possible states. */
@@ -220,8 +221,6 @@ static struct flagstr log_event_table[]={
*/
-#define MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX MAX_PEER_ADDRS /* send at most this many copies */
-
typedef struct {
struct timeval last;
struct comm_addr addr;
@@ -231,7 +230,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* configuration information */
/* runtime information */
int npeers;
- transport_peer peers[MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX];
+ transport_peer peers[MAX_PEER_ADDRS];
} transport_peers;
/* Basic operations on transport peer address sets */
@@ -1962,12 +1961,14 @@ static list_t *site_apply(closure_t *self, struct cloc loc, dict_t *context,
st->mobile_peer_expiry= dict_read_number(
dict,"mobile-peer-expiry",False,"site",loc,DEFAULT_MOBILE_PEER_EXPIRY);
- st->transport_peers_max= !st->peer_mobile ? 1 : dict_read_number(
- dict,"mobile-peers-max",False,"site",loc,DEFAULT_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX);
+ const char *peerskey= st->peer_mobile
+ ? "mobile-peers-max" : "static-peers-max";
+ st->transport_peers_max= dict_read_number(
+ dict,peerskey,False,"site",loc,DEFAULT_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX);
if (st->transport_peers_max<1 ||
- st->transport_peers_max>=MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX) {
- cfgfatal(loc,"site","mobile-peers-max must be in range 1.."
- STRING(MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX) "\n");
+ st->transport_peers_max>=MAX_PEER_ADDRS) {
+ cfgfatal(loc,"site", "%s must be in range 1.."
+ STRING(MAX_PEER_ADDRS) "\n", peerskey);
}
if (st->key_lifetime < DEFAULT(KEY_RENEGOTIATE_GAP)*2)
@@ -2172,11 +2173,11 @@ static bool_t transport_compute_setupinit_peers(struct site *st,
incoming_packet_addr ? " incoming packet address;" : "",
st->peers.npeers);
- /* Non-mobile peers have st->peers.npeers==0 or ==1, since they
- * have transport_peers_max==1. The effect is that this code
- * always uses the configured address if supplied, or otherwise
- * the address of the incoming PROD, or the existing data peer if
- * one exists; this is as desired. */
+ /* Non-mobile peers try addresses until one is plausible. The
+ * effect is that this code always tries first the configured
+ * address if supplied, or otherwise the address of the incoming
+ * PROD, or finally the existing data peer if one exists; this is
+ * as desired. */
transport_peers_copy(st,&st->setup_peers,&st->peers);
transport_peers_expire(st,&st->setup_peers);
@@ -2256,7 +2257,7 @@ void transport_xmit(struct site *st, transport_peers *peers,
int slot;
transport_peers_expire(st, peers);
unsigned failed=0; /* bitmask */
- assert(MAX_MOBILE_PEERS_MAX < sizeof(unsigned)*CHAR_BIT);
+ assert(MAX_PEER_ADDRS < sizeof(unsigned)*CHAR_BIT);
int nfailed=0;
for (slot=0; slot<peers->npeers; slot++) {
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the sgo-software-discuss
mailing list