[Nomic]Proposals 316-324

[Jonathan D. Amery]

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Martin Read wrote:

> Duncan Richer writes:
> > Proposal 316 - Jonathan Amery
> > Some degree of reversability
> > 
> > Enact the following as a rule:
> > 
> > "
> > Some degree of reversability
> > 
> > A Player may at any point at which one of their proposals is still
> > available
> > for voting perform the action of repudiating it.
> > 
> > A repudiated proposal is immediately deemed to be defeated, however the
> > author of the proposal only looses half the number of points that they
> > would
> > usually loose in such an occurance.
> > 
> > This rule takes precidence over any rule specifying what happens when a
> > proposal is defeated.
> > "
> 
> I'm not sure about this; I think people who make bad/hasty proposals
> should have to deal with the results.

 This would save some time if proposals can be shown to be broken, and
reduce the chance of such proposals being voted in.
 

-- 
Jonathan Amery.      Now there's a light at the end of the tunnel,
   #####                Someone's lit a campfire in my cave.
  #######__o         The first rays of dawn are breaking through the clouds,
  #######'/             And somehow I know I can be brave.      - Steve Kitson