Debian-init-diversity Digest, Vol 88, Issue 3

Jesse Smith jessefrgsmith at yahoo.ca
Wed Jan 14 12:55:14 GMT 2026


 > I think it is also worth considering that the 2 pidof implementations 
 > are not completely identical. A brief comparison of the manpages
 > suggests that the separator option is different (-d vs -S) and some 
of > the other options only exist in 1 or other implementation.

For what it is worth, I'd be happy to alias flags (assuming they don't 
conflict with existing flags) in the upstream SysV version of pidof. 
And, if need be, add functionality to our pidof to make SysV a drop-in 
replacement for the other pidof. Or a super-set of the other pidof.

Would that be helpful?

Jesse




More information about the Debian-init-diversity mailing list