Response to active removal of initscripts

[Martin Steigerwald]

Hi.

Martin Steigerwald - 28.07.20, 19:10:41 CEST:
> Martin Steigerwald - 22.07.20, 20:12:51 CEST:
> > Matthew Vernon - 22.07.20, 18:21:36 CEST:
> > > On 08/07/2020 08:41, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > > Matthew Vernon - 08.07.20, 09:37:14 CEST:
[…]
> > > Did you hear anything from Jonathan in the end?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > He cited part of the GR last year¹:
> > 
> > """
> > The Debian project recognizes that systemd service units are the
> > preferred configuration for describing how to start a
> > daemon/service.
> 
> […]
> 
> > I thought about writing something similar to the bug report,
> > starting
> > with "Dear Michael" and doing my best to keep friendly and
> > constructive… but I have been postponing this. I have enough
> > conflict
> > in my life right now without that already. So if anyone else likes
> > to
> > step up for this, be my guest. I certainly do support that.
> 
> I now did, hoping for the best.
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964139#32
> 
> > [1] https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002

No response whatsoever.

I have no idea how to proceed on this. Michael clearly does not appear 
to be cooperative on that one.

Any ideas? Maybe someone who is officially a Debian developer could follow 
up on this?

Best,
-- 
Martin