Response to active removal of initscripts

[Martin Steigerwald]

Matthew Vernon - 09.11.20, 09:22:56 CET:
> On 27/09/2020 14:49, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > On 18/09/2020 16:57, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> >> On 16/09/2020 17:33, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> >>> On 13/09/2020 12:52, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> >>>> On 12/09/2020 23:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> I think the next step is probably to propose an NMU
> >>> 
> >>> So that didn't result in hugs and puppies. It looks like Michael
> >>> isn't going to reply to my last message; I'll give him a bit more
> >>> time, then I'll drop leader@ a line to see if he has anything else
> >>> to
> >>> say.
> >> 
> >> I have now done so.
> > 
> > I got a holding reply on the 21st; it seems reasonable to give
> > Jonathan a bit more time to get back to me.
> 
> I sent a chase on 16th October; and another today. It isn't prudent to
> wait much longer, given the freeze is coming.

Thank you, Matthew!

Ciao,
-- 
Martin