Bug#940034: libelogind0: replacing a core system library and conflicting against the default init considered harmful
Thorsten Glaser
t.glaser at tarent.de
Sat Sep 28 01:48:47 BST 2019
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So one thing I think we should ensure is we don't end up uninstalling
> systemd without an explicit user choice.
I’ve proposed to suggest to the systemd maintainers to add
Important: yes to libsystemd0. (On a different level, adding
it to systemd instead would… probably… have the same effect.)
I think that should fully solve this concern; I’ve got quite
the number of personal packages using Important: yes and have
experience with it.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
More information about the Debian-init-diversity
mailing list