Bug#588666: boot message stuck onto next message

Dmitry Bogatov KAction at disroot.org
Tue Aug 27 18:24:01 BST 2019


control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream

[2019-08-26 16:32] Jesse Smith <jsmith at resonatingmedia.com>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 16:07:30 +0000 Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > > > Each line a process sends:
> > > > * should be prefixed by the name of the process that sent it.
> > > > * should end with a newline.
> > >
> > > And (#398269) each line should be either from a process or the kernel,
> > > distinguishable enough.
> > >
> > > I fully agree, that should be basic and not need discussion.
> >
> > Okay, reassigning then.
> >
> > @Jesse, yet another feature request for startpar :)
>
>
> I have added a command line flag (-n) which causes the name of the
> sending process to prefix output, unless the command is interactive.
>
> It looks like this: startpar -n -t 1 process-a process-b
>
> process-a: Starting process...
> process-b: Starting process...
> process-b: Done.
> process-a: Done.
>
> This will be in the next release of startpar. I'm looking at adding a
> newline to the end of output too.

Great. Thank you. Tagged as-needed.
-- 
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.
Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.




More information about the Debian-init-diversity mailing list