sid trouble

Mark Hindley mark at
Wed Aug 14 16:18:34 BST 2019

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:56:49PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > And if so, why is libpam-elogind a separate package from elogind?
> > If elogind isn’t useful by its own…
> Multi-Arch is of course the answer, see
> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908132253540.12691 at>
> in #934491 ☺


However, I think you have a point that elogind should Recommend libpam-elogind.
That seems to be missing at the moment.



More information about the Debian-init-diversity mailing list